Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Understanding Openfmri Dataset, openfrmi
post Nov 28, 2017, 05:07 AM
Post #1


Group: Basic Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
Member No.: 39425

I am a new comer to Neuroscience.

I am looking to download a dataset (openfmri dot org dataset/ds000116/) which simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI data.

However I am having hard time to understand the dataset and terms involved:
  1. What does raw,curated or processed data means here?
  2. What processing have been done in case of processed data.
  3. Which files to download.

Please suggest
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Nov 29, 2017, 07:33 AM
Post #2


Group: Basic Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Mar 18, 2016
Member No.: 38120

I'm not a Professor, and hope I could provide some suggestive opinions.

1. From my degree of understanding, As for your Q1, the raw data herein may mean the primary data you have get from the EEG or fMRI, or EEG and fMRI, the curated data may mean the data you get by the contrast of the normal or average data, which might be average range data according to Ch Hao, and the processed data may mean the data you process according to some algorithms; as for your Q2, algorithms for the model construction herein may be used; as for Q3, if, if you need to download the dataset, you need to first get access the website, and the databases. If possible, you can use the Autointelligence application to help you for the whole process.

2. "The data or data groups might guide our lives directly following a privacy protection for the usage of the primary data, but the theories which couldn't be used for setting data grouping rules might or will be still vital to the human lives in the future when people owing the advanced autointelligence applications being tested at the same time. Theories live when it's used effectly into practices and let people feel it's rationally natural in their uses. "

3. Experience is one way to show your interest and span for the research, which has no direct links with the innovation and best practices. In my opinion, the continuing ability-based performance with interest is the key and the related recognition is important. I thought the essence of the education was the life-long learning and improvements, in which the so-called formal and regular education should be changed into the intensive and flexible learning aiming for the ability-based performances. To be a real intelligence neuroscientist or cognitive neuroscientist, you might need specialized ability-based performance and fund-included web-platform instead of a doctoral degree or post-doctoral medical background, or some professional training certificates or qualifications. "Learning and improving oneself is a life-long course. To be earnest, degrees and diplomas or occupational certificates or qualifications, even the web courses are totally not necessary to the research, even in the future. Internet, specialized e-contents and the interest for the research, including the practicing and webforum, is necessary." from one poster in this forum.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2019 - 07:43 AM

Home     |     About     |    Research     |    Forum     |    Feedback  

Copyright BrainMeta. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Last Modified Tue Jan 17 2006 12:39 am

BrainMeta is supported by:

The Neurological Foundation & CerebralHealth.com

BrainMeta is enhanced by:

UVISI: Universal Virtual Intelligence Singularity Infinity